Boundaries and Standards of Behavior

Compassion and kindness are beautiful but so are boundaries and standards of behavior.

People want to be held at high standards of behavior even if they don’t know it. Because guilt is harder to bear than anger and truth is more liberating than what seems advantageous.

If you meet people with kindness and compassion all the time for the things that they do, you are also enabling bad behavior. And you are also taking upon yourself the consequences of their actions.

People need to experience the impact of their own mistakes and patterns of behavior and that is what honest reflection allows them to do.

Your boundaries benefit others too.

On Blame

In a conflict both parties are responsible for the interaction. It is almost never the case that only one party is entirely responsible. Blame is a way to try to place your own negativity onto the other person as well, so that they are responsible for your own failings too.

The way I think about it is the following: say a thief has a particular style, that he leaves messages on the walls of the houses he steals from: “XYZ was here” or something like that. Then, another thief, picking up on this, will use the same style to pin it on the first thief so that when the thief gets caught, he will be punished for the crimes of the second thief as well. In the same way, blame uses the other person’s negativity as an excuse to make them responsible for our own negativity too.

It is a very subtle exchange but very powerful and with many consequences. One of those consequences is that we feel victimized by the other and feel quite depended on them and afraid of them, because unconsciously we have made ourselves helpless in the face of their negativity. It is one side of the coin creating the other. The victim creating the persecutor. The moment we accept our own negativity, we take our power back and both roles dissolve.

“There are particular phases in human development where an entity finds it almost impossible to come out of his or her negative defense system, and of the conviction that this defense is necessary, unless one of those people with whom the person is entangled lets them off the hook by admitting his or her own negative intentionality, destructive attitude, dishonesty, and meanness.  Just imagine how you would feel when someone close to you, who has given you pain by pointing out your real and your false guilts, but who has also confused you by the denial of his or her guilt, suddenly said to you:  “I realize that I do not want to give you love.  I want to demand from you and then blame you, accuse you, and punish you when you do not comply with my demands.  But I do not allow you to feel hurt, because although I want to hurt you, I do not want to be made to feel guilty by your hurt.”  Just imagine how this would set you free!  How such an admission can suddenly clear up many confusions!  It is not very likely that you would respond to this act of love by being self-righteous and acting the all-innocent one who has always known this and is now established as the innocent victim.

If you admit your similar unfair demands, your cowardice in giving your feelings, and your negative intentionality, it may indeed be hurtful for your pride, but truly for nothing else!  The other who hears it has, in that moment, received a gift of love from you, even though you may still not want to love with your heart, with your feelings, with your inner being.  But you have begun to love by being truthful.

By setting others free from the false guilt you have placed on them in order to conceal your own, you allow them to look at their own real guilt without self-devastation and without this painful inner struggle in which the mutual guilts and accusations are all confused.  Release and clarification often lead to the solution of the deepest problems.  It is as though the personality needed this “outer” grace, this helping hand.  For the dishonest placing of guilt on others makes their true self-revelation almost impossible; it implies that if they admit guilt you are right in accusing them of being bad and of being the cause of your misery.  This is how people are hooked together in denial, guilt-projection, either/or struggle, confusion, and negative interactions.  Someone must begin to loosen the hook-up and disentangle the knots.”

– Eva Pierrakos, Pathwork Lecture #202: Psychic Interaction of Negativity

Steps to Handling our Anger

Steps to Handling our Anger
from The Surprising Purpose of Anger
by Marshall B. Rosenberg

“When it comes to managing anger, NVC [Nonviolent Communication] shows us how to use anger as an alarm that tells us we are thinking in ways that are not likely to get our needs met, and more likely get us involved in interactions that are not going to be constructive for anyone. Our training stresses that it is dangerous to think of anger as something to be repressed, or as something bad. When we tend to identify anger as a result of something wrong with us, then our tendency is to want to repress it and not deal with anger. That use of anger, to repress and deny it, often leads us to express it in ways that can be very dangerous to ourselves and others.”

“The NVC approach involves several steps. I will go over these steps in part by using an example of a young man in a prison in Sweden. I was working with this man in a prisoner training session, showing the participants how NVC can be used to manage their anger.

The First and Second Steps

The first step in handling our anger using NVC [Nonviolent Communication] is to be conscious that the stimulus, or trigger, of our anger is not the cause of our anger. That is to say that it isn’t simply what people do that makes us angry, but it’s something within us that responds to what they do that is really the cause of the anger. This requires us to be able to separate the trigger from the cause. In the situation with the prisoner in Sweden, the very day that we were focusing on anger, it turned out that he had a lot of anger in relationship to the prison authorities. So he was very glad to have us there to help him deal with anger on that day. I asked him what it was that the prison authorities had done that was the stimulus of his anger. He answered, “I made a request of them three weeks ago, and they still haven’t responded.” Well, he had answered the question in the way that I wanted him to. He had simply told me what they had done. He hadn’t mixed in any evaluation, and that is the first step in managing anger in a nonviolent way: simply to be clear what the stimulus is but not to mix that up with judgements or evaluation. This alone is an important accomplishment. Frequently when I ask such a question I get a response such as, “they were inconsiderate” which is a moral judgement of what they are but doesn’t say what they actually did.

The second step involves our being conscious that the stimulus is never the cause of our anger. That is, it isn’t simply what people do that makes us angry. It is our evaluation of what has been done that is the cause of our anger. And it’s a particular kind of  evaluation.”

“In the case of the prisoner , when he told me that he was angry and that the trigger for his anger was that the prison officials hadn’t responded for three weeks to his request, I asked him to look inside and tell me what the cause of his anger was. He seemed confused, and he said to me: “I just told you the cause of my anger, I made a request three weeks ago and the prison officials still haven’t responded to it.”

I told him “Now, what you told me was the trigger for your anger. In our previous sessions I’ve tried to clarify for you that it’s never simply the trigger that creates our anger. The cause is what we’re looking for. So I’d like you to tell me how you are interpreting their behavior, how you are looking at it, that is causing you to be angry.”

He was very confused at this point. He was like many of us: He had not been trained to be conscious of what was going on within himself when he was angry. So I had to give him a little help to get an idea of what I meant by how to just stop and listen to the kind of thoughts that might be going on the inside of us that are always at the core of anger.

After a few moments he said to me: “OK, I see what you mean. I’m angry because I’m telling myself it isn’t fair, that isn’t a decent way to treat human beings. They are acting as though they are important, and I’m nothing.” And he had several other such judgements that were floating rapidly through his head. Notice he initially said it was simply their behavior that was making him angry. But it was really all of these thoughts that he had within himself that were making him angry, any one of which could have created his anger. But he was ready with a whole series of such judgements, “They’re not fair; they’re not treating me right.” All such judgements are the cause of anger.

Once he had identified this, he said to me, “Well, what’s wrong with thinking that way?” And I said: “I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with thinking that way. I’d just like you to be conscious that it’s thinking that way which is the cause of your anger. And we don’t want to mix up what people do – the trigger – with the cause of anger.

Now, this is very hard for many of us to keep straight: to not mix up the trigger, or stimulus, of our anger with the cause of our anger. The reason that that’s not easy for us is that we may have been educated by people who use guilt as a primary form of trying to motivate us. When you want to use guilt as a way of manipulating people, you need to confuse them into thinking that the trigger is the cause of the feelings. In other words, if you want to use guilt with somebody, you need to communicate in a way that indicates that your pain is being caused simply by what they do. In other words, their behavior is not simply the stimulus of your feelings; it’s the cause of your feelings.”

“If we are to manage anger in ways that are in harmony with the principles of NVC, it’s important for us to be conscious of this key distinction: I feel as I do because I am telling myself thoughts about the other person’s actions that imply wrongness on their part. Such thoughts take the form of judgements such as, “I think the person is selfish, I think the person is rude, or lazy , or manipulating people, and they shouldn’t do that.” Such thoughts take either the form of direct judgement of others or indirect judgements expressed through such things as, “I’m judging this person as thinking only they have something worth saying”. In these latter expressions, it’s implicit that we think what they’re doing isn’t right.

Now, that’s important, because if I think this other person is making me feel this way, it’s going to be hard for me not to imagine punishing them.”

Related image

The Third Step

“The third step involves looking for the need that is the root of our anger. This is built on the assumption that we get angry because our needs are not getting met. The problem is that we’re not in touch with our needs. Instead of being directly connected to our need, we go up to our head and start thinking of what’s wrong with other people for not meeting our needs. The judgements we make of other people – which cause our anger – are really alienated expressions of unmet needs.”

”Let’s go back to the case of the prisoner from Sweden. After we had identified the judgements he was making that were creating his anger, I asked him to look behind the judgements and tell me what needs of his were not getting met. These unmet needs were actually being expressed through the judgements he was making of the prison officials.

This wasn’t easy for him to do because when people are trained to think in terms of wrongness of others, they are often blind to what they themselves need. They often have very little vocabulary for describing their needs. It requires shifting attention away from judging outward, to looking inward and seeing what the need is. But with some help, he was finally able to get in touch with his need and he said: “Well, my need is to be able to take care of myself when I get out of prison by being able to get work. So the request that I was making of the prison officials was for training to meet that need. If I don’t get that training, I’m not going to be able to take care of myself economically when I get out of prison, and I’m going to end up back in here.”

Then I said to the prisoner, “Now that you’re in touch with your need, how are you feeling?” He said, “I’m scared.” So when we are directly connected to our need, we are never angry any more. The anger hasn’t been repressed; the anger has been transformed into need-serving feelings.”

“After I pointed out to the prisoner the difference between getting in touch with his needs and the feelings that he had, he was then aware of his fear. He could see that the anger was because of the thinking about the wrongness of others. I then asked the prisoner, “Do you think you’re more likely to get your needs met if, when you go in to talk to the prison officials, you are connected to your needs and the fear, or if you are up in your head judging them and angry?”

And he could see very clearly that he was much more likely to get his needs met if he were to be communicating from a position of connection to his needs, rather than separated from his needs and thinking of others in ways that implied wrongness. At the moment that he had this insight into what a different world he would be living in when he was in touch with his needs as opposed to judging others, he looked down at the floor and had about as sad a look on his face as I can recall any person ever having had. And I asked him, “What’s going on?”

He said, “I can’t talk about it right now.” Later that day, he helped me understand what was going on in him. He came to me and said: “Marshall, I wish you could have taught me two years ago about anger what you taught me this morning. I wouldn’t have had to kill my best friend.”

Tragically, two years before, his best friend had done some things and he felt great rage in response to his judgements about what his friend had done. But instead of being conscious of what his needs were behind of that, he really thought it was his friend that made him angry, and in a tragic interaction ended up killing his friend.”

“This is a very important step that I have just outlines: To be conscious of the thinking that is creating anger. And as I said, the prisoner at first was totally oblivious to all of the thoughts that were going on within him that made him angry. The reason for this is that our thoughts go on very rapidly. Many of our thoughts go so quickly through our heads that we are not even aware that they are there, and it really looks to  us as though it was the stimulus that was the cause of our anger.

I have outlined three steps in managing our anger using NVC:

  1. Identify the stimulus for our anger, without confusing it with the evaluation. 
  2. Identify the internal image of judgement that is making us angry. 
  3.  Transform this judgemental image into the need that it is expressing; in other words, bring our full attention to the need that is behind the judgement.”

The Fourth Step

“The fourth step includes saying to the other person four pieces of information. First, we reveal to them the stimulus: what they have done that is in conflict with our needs being fulfilled. Secondly, we express how we are feeling. Notice we are not repressing the anger.  The anger has been transformed into a feeling such as sad, hurt, scared, frustrated, or the like. And then we follow up our expression of our feelings with the needs of ours that are not being fulfilled.

And now we add to those three pieces of information a clear, present request of what we want from the other person in relationship to our feelings and unmet needs.

So in the situation with the prisoner, the fourth step on this part would be to go the prison officials and say something like this: “I made a request three weeks ago. I still haven’t heard from you, and I’m feeling scared because I have a need to be able to earn a living when I leave this prison, and I’m afraid that without the training I was requesting it would be very hard for me to make a living. So I’d like you to tell me what is preventing you from responding to my request.”

If we’re sufficiently trained in getting in touch with the need behind the judgements, we can take a deep breath and very rapidly go through the process that I led the prisoner through. In other words, as soon as we catch ourselves getting angry, we take a deep breath, stop, look inside, and ask ourselves quickly, “What am I telling myself that’s making me so angry?” We quickly get in touch with the need that is behind that judgement. When we’re in touch with the need we will feel in our body a shift away from anger to other kinds of feelings, and when we’re at that point we can open our mouths and say to the other person what we’re observing, feeling, needing and make our requests.”

These are some fragments from a short but valuable book (40 pages) that you can find online. Like here.

On Emotional Reactivity

Earlier today I posted on Facebook a quote by Adyashanti on Meditative Self-Inquiry. I often like to share the best things I find on the internet with others, which are generally things that relate to spirituality or that have a spiritual undertone. But soon after I posted it, someone I know commented on my post with an image similar to this one:

It hit my pretty hard and I got very angry, much angrier than I thought I would. I have been unemployed for more than a year, and this meme hit me right where it hurt. They knew about my job situation and so I naturally assumed ill intent, which made me even angrier. Not only that, but it was also done in front of everyone I knew, so I also felt humiliated.

I tried to contain my anger but I also wanted to tell this person that what they did bothered me. So I confronted them and I told them that it was not OK, because it would have been like me broadcasting their vulnerability on their Facebook page for the world to see. They told me that they thought the post was written by me and that I could dedicate myself to doing something productive instead of wasting my time and creativity doing something that wasn’t going to help me financially. That still didn’t make me feel better since I didn’t like answering to anyone, so I was still very angry.  Seeing how upset I was, my friend apologized and said that they just thought it was very funny, and they really seemed to believe that and then they removed their comment from my post.

That is when I had a moment where something shifted inside me and I realized that I had a tendency to blame the entirety of that situation on this other person, that I felt self-righteous about it, and that I saw myself as a victim in that scenario. When I understood that there wasn’t ill intent behind her actions, but good intentions executed poorly my attention almost instantly shifted to myself. I was being reminded that every interaction is a two-way street and that it takes two to tango, right?

So what exactly did I find in myself? What was that situation revealing to me? Well… I realized that lately I have indeed been overly dedicated to spiritual pursuits and learning about the nature of reality and esotericism, but then these things, as important as they are, were distracting me from more pressing matters like getting a job and being independent. This should be my #1 priority right now and my friend’s message awoke me from the slumber. Also it made me realize that I’ve been engaging in Spiritual Bypassing – which is using spirituality as a way to avoid accountability – which is something I thought I understood as a concept and that I had under control, but it turns out some aspects of it eluded me, or maybe I refused to admit them to myself.

I also saw how easy it is to get reactive and make it all about the other person’s mistake, how easy it is to assume ill intent and negative motivations and not see your part in the conflict. That’s why if it was intended as a joke, I couldn’t treat at such and laugh about it. It hurt me.

There was also the perception of being humiliated in front of other people which added to it and hurt also. Or the trigger of having to answer to an authority figure which made me feel indignation and anger. It’s very multifaceted.

So the feelings that came up for me were anger, indignation, humiliation and shame. All these came rushing at me in what felt like a boiling anger sensation. But the instant I started taking things back to myself, these feelings started to subside. As though the energy had been reversed from being aimed at the other person to leading me within to their source. It’s like they were the propelling force that guided me in my inner expedition.

Then I started understanding that the mistake the other person made was due to an incomplete understanding of things, not due to bad intentions. When my anger boiled, I had thoughts of revenge, not through harming them, but through succeeding in life (“that’ll show them”), which also subsided once I started looking into myself.  It’s easy to reduce the other person to the role of the persecutor when you don’t investigate the part you play in the conflict. Which is why others mirror to us our own fears and stir within us the spirit of investigation. The Divine Will acts through others to show us to ourselves.

I’m not saying my friend did nothing wrong . From a higher perspective, sure, this is a learning experience and we’re all learning. But at a relative level, they didn’t consider how it would affect me to be made fun of in front of everyone on something I was vulnerable about. I told my friend that the problem was that their reasoning was incomplete. But then that made me think about how we often don’t realize the ways in which we impact others and how it’s up to the other person to let us know where we might infringe on their boundaries, hopefully in a compassionate manner.

I think this is such an important thought to consider… that many and I’d even say most times people hurt us or we hurt them because of an incomplete understanding of things, a failure to see some important aspects of a problem. But then there’s another aspect which is perhaps even more important which is that we must try to seek our own part in the conflict. Many times conflicts arise from assumptions of ill intent coupled with a desire to defend our image so if we give the other person the benefit of the doubt and change the subject of examination to ourselves, we may find an abundance of wounds underneath our elicited emotions. And those wounds surface during unexpected times and in unexpected ways and are the driving forces to our potential emotional reactivity.  Of course, not every negative emotion we experience is due to our wounding, sometimes the fault may be with the other person indeed, which means that discernment is needed to distinguish between the two. But the step of self-inquiry is still necessary regardless of the situation, as we need to discriminate between emotions that arise due to violations of our boundaries and values or those arise due to wounding and assumptions of ill intent.

If we don’t indulge in the feelings the trigger elicits by being reactive and taking it personally and if instead we allow ourselves to feel them, we can redirect our attention to ourselves and use the momentum of the emotional response to understand why those reactions were brought up in us. This can help us understand how our emotions are linked with our wounds and how they can surface and take a life of their own when they are “provoked” or “disturbed”.

Then we can deepen our investigation and connect our wounds with our unmet emotional needs, which can lead us to important revelations, but maybe that will be the subject of another post.

“If you imagine someone who is brave enough to withdraw all his projections, then you get an individual who is conscious of a pretty thick shadow. Such a man has saddled himself with new problems and conflicts. He has become a serious problem to himself, as he is now unable to say that they do this or that, they are wrong, and they must be fought against… Such a man knows that whatever is wrong in the world is in himself, and if he only learns to deal with his own shadow he has done something real for the world. He has succeeded in shouldering at least an infinitesimal part of the gigantic, unsolved social problems of our day.”

– Carl Jung


Image may contain: outdoor

The Adyashanti quote:

Caroline Myss on Avoiding Powerful Guidance:

On Boundaries and Blind Compassion

Something I wrote in September 2017:

Being someone that struggles with setting boundaries, there are a few things I have come to realize about them.

For one, they are strongly related to the socially programmed construct of having to “be nice”. One side effect of adopting such a belief is that you begin to ignore, suppress and deny the expression of any emotion which may be considered negative or which may suggest lower impulses (anger, sadness, disappointment, etc.). This interferes with a very important aspect of one’s behavior, authenticity. The conditioning unintentionally starts with our childhood when we are told that we have to behave (which is necessary to an extent) but then society takes advantage of this door to our psyche in order to instill its rules by rewarding the ‘virtue’ of obeying authority, which in essence is the quality of ‘being nice’ and not causing problems. Being nice is very insidious as it can get you to lose your integrity if it becomes the purpose that supersedes being true to yourself. That’s a way of making you accept things without a reaction by opting for agreeableness at the detriment of sincerity.

Another thing that I observed was that when you feel bad due to somebody else’s actions, then not expressing your true emotions leaves you angry and bitter. The other person may not have bad intentions, but keeping yourself in line just so you don’t bother the other person even though they are causing you discomfort is a recipe for resentment. And here is where the word ‘NO’ works miracles. From my experience, people who have difficulty setting limits are afraid that saying no might be interpreted as ill will, when in reality it’s just self preservation. Not only that, but they are also afraid of hurting another person with their sincerity. And in extreme cases, they may even hurt themselves by refusing to do what is right for them – acting according to their feelings – just because the opposite is expected of them.

One more thing I noticed from my own experience is that people who struggle with saying no complain…a lot! I only figured out the reason for this today! Yes, it took me a while! It’s because they fail to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HOW THEY FEEL and they blame others instead. In doing so, they are basically turning people into aggressors while it is them that are enabling (what is perceived as) aggression by accepting the ‘aggressive’ behavior. Get that MINDFUCK!

Related image

It’s exactly today that I stumbled upon this wakeup-world article called ‘Power and Corruption: The Matrix of the Master and Slave’ and in it the author talked about how in every Master-Slave dynamic it is always the Slave that has to do something to change the situation in order to bring new awareness to the interaction. That’s because the Master is satisfied with his position (and those that are satisfied don’t seek) even if he’s not consciously aware that he’s inflicting pain or provoking discomfort and so it is the responsibility of the slave to revolt and re-frame the situation so that the cycle is broken:

“Hegel’s theory presents an extraordinary and compelling truth; the world is made up of masters and slaves and neither will ever become conscious unless this pattern is broken and remade. Moreover, the more conscious individuals are, the less likely they will enslave others, or accept enslavement. […] When one consciousness meets the other the stronger one will enslave the other. If the slave does not revolt this status quo will remain; and neither becomes conscious. If the Slave becomes conscious there is revolution. Only then is the Master conscious as well. Only when The Slave revolts is either the Slave or Master conscious.”

– Ethan Indigo Smith

“Blind compassion is rooted in the belief that we are all doing the best we can. When we are driven by blind compassion, we cut everyone far too much slack, making excuses for others’ behavior and making nice situations that require a forceful “no”, an unmistakable voicing of displeasure, or a firm setting and maintaining of boundaries. These things can, and often should be done out of love, but blind compassion keeps love too meek, sentenced to wearing a kind face. Blind compassion is kindness rooted in fear, and not just fear of confrontation, but also fear of not coming across as a good or spiritual person.

When we are engaged in blind compassion we rarely show anger, for we not only believe that compassion has to be gentle, we are also frightened of upsetting anyone, especially to the point of their confronting us. This is reinforced by our judgment about anger, especially in its more fiery forms, as something less spiritual; something that shouldn’t be there if we were being truly loving. Blind compassion reduces us to harmony junkies, entrapping us in unrelentingly positive expression.

With blind compassion we don’t know how to – or won’t learn how to – say “no” with any real power, avoiding confrontation at all costs and, as a result, enabling unhealthy patterns to continue. Our “yes” is then anemic and impotent, devoid of impact it could have if we were also able to access a clear, strong “no” that emanated from our core.

When we mute our essential voice, our openness is reduced to a permissive gap, an undiscerning embrace, a poorly boundaries receptivity, all of which indicate a lack of compassion for ourselves (in that we don’t adequately protect ourselves). Blind compassion confuses anger with aggression, forcefulness with violence, judgment with condemnation, caring with exaggerated tolerance, and more tolerance with spiritual correctness.”

– Robert Augustus Masters


On Expectations and Moral Standards

Often times I would find myself in situations that would make me really angry. Somebody would say, assume or do something, that would infuriate me to such an extent that it would make me feel physically sick. I would play what they said in my mind for hours after our interaction feeling surprised that they could treat me they way they did and the built up anger would send me into a maddening bout of frustration akin to clutching your hair with your hands and screaming, except on the inside. The effect of such an interaction would make me feel off for days in a row and my head and stomach would hurt. And despite going through them, I would still not be prepared for the next challenge of the same sort.

For a while these things were happening quite frequently. Someone would say something and bam! I would start getting so annoyed that I’d have to stop talking to them for a while, block them on my phone or lash out at them. Being poorly treated would get me into a negative state very quickly and it would take very long to subside. The physical effects would be too intense for me and I would need some time on my own to recover. The effects would be problems sleeping, stomach aches, headaches, sweating, inability to focus, overthinking, irritability and a feeling like being under siege, like a psychic form of electrocution. I didn’t know what to do about them, but I knew I was getting tired of having my attention and energy consumed by these negative experiences.

I had experienced anger before, but never like this, sending me into a downward spiral of rage. So what was going on? Why was my anger suddenly so explosive? What were the thoughts behind it? There had to be some underlying beliefs that were causing that reaction. The beliefs are the ingredients after all, and the other person triggering me is the stimulus that set everything into motion. Chemical reactions. Just like if you store potassium in mineral oil, it will stay in its original state, never knowing its potential, yet if you put it in water, it will produce heat/energy.


Each such experience would give me the opportunity to observe myself and understand what was going on in those interactions. One of the things I observed was that the reason I was experiencing that kind of anger is that my sense of boundaries were beginning to change. Things that I had allowed in the past were beginning to feel not good enough for me. I wasn’t going to tolerate being mistreated anymore. Yet people were still relating to the image I had built over time. And it made me angry because I felt I couldn’t change it. I hated feeling disrespected or being taken for granted or being shown a lack of consideration. I wanted to remove these people from my life because I couldn’t deal with the fact that this is who they wanted me to be.

I also didn’t respond to the things they were saying to correct their perception. I either got angry at them and said something mean or I would just not say anything in the moment, but would stop talking to them afterwards or make radical decisions about them. Not saying anything turned out to be a terrible idea, because to that person you are agreeing to the perception they have of you and they don’t get a chance to learn who you are, who you’ve become. So you don’t get to express your point of view, and the other person doesn’t get to learn about you. Not very helpful. Lashing out wasn’t a very good solution either, as it just transfers the negative energy to the other person who is surprised by your reaction since you didn’t take the time to fill them in on your new developments. But since I didn’t know what to do and since the emotions were too powerful, all I had to do was wait and see.

And soon after that something did happen. It was an experience that had a big impact on me and opened my eyes to these dynamics. So this is what happened. I was talking to this person who I wasn’t on very good terms with. The problem was that we had to share some things and she clearly claimed the best for herself even though they were available to be used for a chunk of time by anybody. She asked me if that was OK and I reluctantly said yes. Needless to say I got really angry. That day I started crying, because I felt I wasn’t making any progress with these kinds of situations. And I felt helpless and hopeless, yet it was then that a revelation arrived in my mind: the reason I get angry is that I expect people to act by the same moral standards that I do. 

I often find that the revelations I get are very simple, yet they somehow manage to elude me. Of course! If I weren’t so adamant about people behaving the “right way”, then I could just respond to their actions instead of getting hurt by them. If I didn’t expect people to behave the way I would, then I wouldn’t be met with surprise when they don’t and I could focus on the actual interaction. But instead of being present and answering to the demands of the situation, my attention was drawn to the emotions it triggered and so I became perplexed, angry, displeased, resentful.

If instead of taking it personally I would have turned it around and called out people on their bad behavior, it would have been a service to everyone involved. The truth of the situation would have risen to be seen. This would have dispersed the negative emotions that would otherwise have settled in the mind/body/spirit.

The tricky bit is that you need to cultivate that awareness of the moment so that you can respond accordingly. Therefore it is important to let go of expectations or history so that you can judge a person’s action by what it is, not by what you expect or want it to be. I think it helps to get into an exploratory mindset and not rely on preconceived notions of how things are or should be because otherwise one of two things is likely to happen if there isn’t a good connection between thought and emotion:

  1. either you get angry and you lash out at the other person
  2. or you get so lost in your emotions because of the surprise (caused by the cognitive dissonance between what you expect and what actually happened) that it has a dizzying effect on your mind and you accept the bad behavior but build resentment

“By giving up a little of what you want — most often unconsciously — you are willing to see what is. With such an attitude, you can perceive the reality of the situation. After that you can discriminate intelligently and you will respect yourself, not only for the ability to give up something you want freely and without hostility, but also because then you will be able to rely on your intuition. By being willing to see what actually is, you can deal with the situation. Therefore you will trust yourself, your judgment, and other people. In not overestimating them, due to your forcing current, you will be able to see, observe, sense, and feel what is true, and not merely believe what you want to be true.”

– Eva Pierrakos, The Pathwork Lectures

It is quite a feat to overcome expectations, wishful thinking, history and experience, but cultivating awareness really helps. When you are confronted with a thing whose image you have built in your head, you’re still trying to relate to that thing by your mental projections, despite the evidence that it’s something different. It’s like…the mind takes a while to catch up, it’s confused in its planned reactions to things, like new input that a computer program doesn’t know how to process. Every new experience is an opportunity to develop a new framework for dealing with the new input. In essence, a new lesson is learned which has the potential to free the mind from its underlying pattern. So yeah…wow…I thought I understood cognitive dissonance, but it’s amazing what ramifications you can find to an idea.


After that lesson, I thought I understood how this worked and then something else happened a few days later. A friend asked me for advice about something he was going to do. I analyzed the situation and I told him that I didn’t believe it was a good idea. I didn’t want to tell him directly what to do so I tried to suggest different aspects that he wasn’t considering, yet he dismissed them. I think I was rather insistent. Instead of listening to him and ask questions, I kept trying to illustrate my point of view through my own experiences and the things I thought I understood. I wanted him to see the truth of what I was saying. And I got really angry when he was still settled on his original intention. The good thing is that I had the presence of spirit to realize that this was not about him, but that I was bothered by this because of something within me. What was it?

I realized I got angry when people don’t do what I believe to be the right thing…the fair thing. It’s not just when they hurt me, it’s when they don’t acknowledge the truth that I see. It pissed me off! I found that I had very high standards as to how people were supposed to behave and it bothered me when they failed themselves and engaged in what I considered to be bad behaviors. And then it hit me! I figured out that the root of this was somewhere in childhood. The wound that was being brought up to the surface was the fact that I felt that my truth had not been acknowledged growing up, and I had to fight for it. It felt like truth had no say in the matter and this feeling spilled into my standards for other people and being disappointed in them and trying to control them into making the right choice. It felt like that would give me back my dignity and power…and the revelation was that there’s still a degree of power that I derive from other people’s attitude towards me. It felt like their acknowledgement of what’s fair would validate me.

I also found that this need for people to act on your moral standards is an expression of narcissism, wanting everyone to act the same, by the same ethical code as you, without considering that they have different backgrounds, different lessons learned. But what works for you may not work for another and when you hold people to such high expectations you are not accepting them for who they are but only for who you want them to be.

Trying to control others is not only an affirmation of the other person’s reality, it is also a way to immerse yourself in it. It’s declaring yourself powerless and ineffective, thus allowing yourself to become a victim and the other person a persecutor, whereas if you were to call them out, you would correct a misperception, you would reject reductive roles, you would empower yourself and you would treat the other like a person instead of like an obstacle. So my trying to control others into doing the right thing is due to that stuck feeling of powerlessness in deciding things for myself, in deciding my destiny and blaming others for hurting me, for ignoring the facts, which is sort of like a way to ask permission to be yourself. But it helps to realize you don’t need to answer to anyone but yourself. You don’t need anybody’s permission to do anything, you can stand strong in what you believe to be right and others are free to make of it what they will.

These days I’m not getting that angry anymore. I know that a lot of times when I get angry, I really get angry at myself, for not making the right choices or for not speaking my truth. Every situation where I feel forced to do something is showing me where I need to work on myself and where I believe my power resides.

Negative emotions are amazing tools that can tell us important things about ourselves and I think that it would help us a lot to learn how to work with them and learn from them.

Though aggression might seem to be an inevitable outcome of anger, it actually is an avoidance of anger and the hurt and vulnerability that are part of it. Viewing anger as aggression or as the cause of aggression provides us with an excuse to classify it as a “lower” or “primitive” emotion. Yes, anger does have a primitive side — shared with every mammal — but it’s far more than just a primitive arising, despite the fact that our use of it is often far from civilized.

— Robert Augustus Masters